<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Network Broadcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk</link>
	<description>The moans and groans of CCIE #38338</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta3-24375</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by Jamie Grive</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Grive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;3rd time was a pass!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3rd time was a pass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by Jamie Grive</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Grive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m actually still subscribing :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quip - my honest opinion would be don&#039;t go for the re-read. It made no difference for me - I don&#039;t think they actually run up the troubleshooting the same way as they do for a lab re-read where a proctor would spend a long time looking at outputs and configuration methods.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think I actually ended up paying for a proctor to re-read my passing configuration section!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Next attempt for me is June 11th... 3rd time lucky!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually still subscribing <img src='http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>Quip &#8211; my honest opinion would be don&#8217;t go for the re-read. It made no difference for me &#8211; I don&#8217;t think they actually run up the troubleshooting the same way as they do for a lab re-read where a proctor would spend a long time looking at outputs and configuration methods.</p>

<p>I think I actually ended up paying for a proctor to re-read my passing configuration section!</p>

<p>Next attempt for me is June 11th&#8230; 3rd time lucky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by David Rothera</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I highly doubt Jamie will still be checking on this post for follow up comments, you might want to head over to his site at gettheguru.co.uk and drop him an email.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt Jamie will still be checking on this post for follow up comments, you might want to head over to his site at gettheguru.co.uk and drop him an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by Quip</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Quip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Jamie,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m in the same boat. I got my results today and I passed config and failed TS (68%) like you did. I swear i solved nine of the tickets without breaking the restrictions. I never removed any configuration, just changed (ex. a deny to a permit). The one ticket that I couldn&#039;t solve was a 3 point&#039;er, but I was 100% sure those other nine tickets were solved...(even double checked before time ran out). I&#039;m curious to know what were the results of your re-read? I&#039;m considering doing the same.....please give me your feedback. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie,</p>

<p>I&#8217;m in the same boat. I got my results today and I passed config and failed TS (68%) like you did. I swear i solved nine of the tickets without breaking the restrictions. I never removed any configuration, just changed (ex. a deny to a permit). The one ticket that I couldn&#8217;t solve was a 3 point&#8217;er, but I was 100% sure those other nine tickets were solved&#8230;(even double checked before time ran out). I&#8217;m curious to know what were the results of your re-read? I&#8217;m considering doing the same&#8230;..please give me your feedback. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by murksauce</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>murksauce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey David, I am in a similar situation with passing the TS but config had strange values after triple checking my work with ping tests, traceroutes config scannings and show commands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where any other areas impacted by your layer 2 score???&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My breakdown was&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Layer 2 Technologies    48%
Layer 3 Technologies    68%
IP Multicast    100%
Advanced Services   55%
Optimize the Network    100%&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do remember leaving a few BGP debugs running on R2 but nothing else.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not really understanding how I got so low on those sections but sections that depend on layer 2 and 3 have 100%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I sent it in for a reread just for peace of mind. The wait is nerve wrecking Hopefully I get similar results because I hate getting something wrong and not knowing what  was really wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David, I am in a similar situation with passing the TS but config had strange values after triple checking my work with ping tests, traceroutes config scannings and show commands.</p>

<p>Where any other areas impacted by your layer 2 score???</p>

<p>My breakdown was</p>

<p>Layer 2 Technologies    48%
Layer 3 Technologies    68%
IP Multicast    100%
Advanced Services   55%
Optimize the Network    100%</p>

<p>I do remember leaving a few BGP debugs running on R2 but nothing else.</p>

<p>Not really understanding how I got so low on those sections but sections that depend on layer 2 and 3 have 100%.</p>

<p>I sent it in for a reread just for peace of mind. The wait is nerve wrecking Hopefully I get similar results because I hate getting something wrong and not knowing what  was really wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCIE Update and plaque by funkychild</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/04/ccie-update-and-plaque/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>funkychild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=562#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice trophy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Congratulations !!!!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice trophy.</p>

<p>Congratulations !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sun Quad NICs and x86_64 kernels by Sebastian Mäki (@SebastianMaki)</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2011/04/sun-quad-nics-and-x86_64-kernels/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Mäki (@SebastianMaki)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidrothera.co.uk/cisco/?p=149#comment-132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I had the same problem and. I update the kernel from time to time, so just patching my current kernel wouldn&#039;t do. I created an akmod package for Fedora that has this patch. It&#039;s at https://github.com/neatbasis/sunhme2g 
You should be able to update the kernel and the driver will be rebuilt against the new kernel with akmod.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem and. I update the kernel from time to time, so just patching my current kernel wouldn&#8217;t do. I created an akmod package for Fedora that has this patch. It&#8217;s at <a href="https://github.com/neatbasis/sunhme2g" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/neatbasis/sunhme2g</a> 
You should be able to update the kernel and the driver will be rebuilt against the new kernel with akmod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who said re-reads are useless? by CCIE #38620 &#8211; My story &#124; Route Reflector</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/02/who-said-re-reads-are-useless/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>CCIE #38620 &#8211; My story &#124; Route Reflector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=457#comment-131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] David Rothera&#8217;s success story [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Rothera&#8217;s success story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Try again next time&#8230; by David Rothera</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/01/try-again-next-time/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=440#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Check the newer entries ;) I passed later on :)&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the newer entries <img src='http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I passed later on <img src='http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Try again next time&#8230; by robot_chicken</title>
		<link>http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/2013/01/try-again-next-time/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>robot_chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/?p=440#comment-129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Good Luck next time.. I think you are going to blow that exam away!! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Luck next time.. I think you are going to blow that exam away!! <img src='http://networkbroadcast.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
